TORONTO — The Supreme Court decides Wednesday if it will weigh in on a ruling related to the defence of extreme intoxication.
Critics worry the earlier decision will allow a person accused of violent crime to argue they did not know what they were doing.
The Ontario Court of Appeal set aside convictions in two cases after finding part of the law unconstitutional.
Read more: New trial ordered for Thomas Chan
The relevant provision bars an accused from using self-induced extreme intoxication as a defence.
The men in the two cases, Thomas Chan and David Sullivan, were both high on drugs when they either killed or injured close relatives.
Both were convicted but the Appeal Court said it’s wrong to punish someone for something they did involuntarily.
© 2020 The Canadian Press
View original article here Source